In the context of securing a corporate network, which approach is emphasized by zero trust security?

Zero trust security emphasizes the principle of "never trust, always verify." This means that no person or device within or outside the network is trusted by default, regardless of whether they are inside the corporate perimeter. Instead, it focuses on limiting access based on verified identity, which involves continuous authentication and authorization of users and devices attempting to access resources.

In a zero trust model, access to sensitive data and applications is granted only after the user’s identity has been thoroughly validated through multiple factors—this could include biometrics, security tokens, and behavioral analytics. The aim is to minimize attack surfaces and reduce the risk of data breaches by ensuring that access is tightly controlled and monitored at all times. This approach aligns with the changing landscape of cybersecurity, where threats can arise from both internal and external sources.

The other options, while they may describe various security practices, do not align with the core tenet of zero trust security. Trusting internal users by default is fundamentally opposed to the zero trust philosophy. Allowing access through a virtual private network offers a certain level of security but still operates on the assumption that users connected to the VPN can be trusted, which contradicts zero trust principles. Finally, relying solely on strong passwords does not address the need for continuous verification necessary