Which non-active test identifies a specific objective to determine whether parties involved know what to do?

The focus of this question is on the type of non-active testing that aims to identify whether all parties involved understand their roles and responsibilities in a specific scenario. A tabletop exercise serves this purpose effectively as it provides a structured environment where participants can discuss and walk through a hypothetical scenario, fostering open dialogue and facilitating knowledge transfer.

During a tabletop exercise, participants simulate a response to a situation in a low-pressure setting without the need for active implementation. This allows them to clarify procedures, roles, and decision-making processes, enabling the evaluation of the effectiveness of existing plans and the readiness of individuals. The primary goal is to ensure that all parties understand what actions to take during a real incident, thereby aiding in improving overall preparedness.

In contrast, other types of tests do not focus specifically on objective understanding in the same way. For instance, a parallel test may involve executing the current process alongside a new process to compare their effectiveness. A full interruption goes further by actually stopping operations, which is disruptive rather than focused on understanding. Lastly, while a walk-through may involve reviewing processes or plans, it does not engage participants in the same way as a tabletop exercise does, which encourages active discussion and participation. Thus, the tabletop exercise is the ideal non-active test for assessing