Which security testing method is typically used in addition to other methods and is associated with continuous development and CI/CD environments?

The choice of Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST) is particularly relevant in the context of continuous development and CI/CD environments due to its ability to provide real-time feedback during the software development process. IAST operates by embedding instrumentation within the application, allowing it to monitor and evaluate the application’s behavior while it is running. This active testing method enables developers to identify security vulnerabilities as they are coding and deploying, making it highly compatible with the agile and iterative nature of CI/CD practices.

In environments where code is continuously integrated and deployed, having a testing method that seamlessly integrates into the development pipeline is crucial. IAST enhances the testing phase by allowing immediate detection and remediation of security issues, thereby promoting a culture of security within development teams. This proactive approach facilitates faster iterations and more secure code deliveries.

While other methods like Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) and Static Application Security Testing (SAST) are important components of a comprehensive security strategy, they do not offer the same level of integration and real-time results in a CI/CD context. DAST typically tests running applications without access to source code, which might lead to a delay in identifying issues, while SAST analyzes source code before it is executed, potentially missing vulnerabilities that arise from dynamic interactions within the