Which type of assessment may be a regulatory or contractual requirement and helps identify both obvious and non-obvious issues to enhance internal vulnerability assessments?

A third-party assessment is typically conducted by an independent organization that specializes in evaluating security measures and vulnerabilities within an organization. This type of assessment is often mandated by regulatory bodies or specified in contractual agreements to ensure compliance with industry standards and legal requirements.

By engaging a third party, an organization gains access to an objective perspective, which can reveal both obvious vulnerabilities, such as misconfigured systems, and non-obvious issues that may be overlooked by internal teams, such as weaknesses in policies or practices.

This type of assessment is comprehensive, as third parties can utilize various methods, including active and passive scanning, interviews, and documentation reviews, to provide a thorough analysis. The findings help organizations enhance their internal vulnerability assessments by addressing identified shortcomings and ensuring a more robust security posture. Furthermore, leveraging the expertise of third-party assessors can also instill greater confidence among stakeholders regarding the organization's security measures.